一個國家背後的主義,如共產,民主等等,其實是一個意識態 ideology。實質是一個哲學事宜,一個宗教事宜。
宗教哲學的事情不同科學,並不是全客觀的。背後都藏著一個信字,因為係一個信念。
因此,在激烈的討論後還是一個信與不信的問題。縱使天天你罵我,我又罵你,到最後都是沒有結論的,是多餘的。
生命就像編織一樣,用自己的手,一針一針的編織出自己的歷史。 Life is like knitting, we knit our history pin by pin.
一個國家背後的主義,如共產,民主等等,其實是一個意識態 ideology。實質是一個哲學事宜,一個宗教事宜。
宗教哲學的事情不同科學,並不是全客觀的。背後都藏著一個信字,因為係一個信念。
因此,在激烈的討論後還是一個信與不信的問題。縱使天天你罵我,我又罵你,到最後都是沒有結論的,是多餘的。
Recently, in my living district, there is a new owner who wants to build a bigger-than-standard house. Since he is planning to build bigger than city's standard, so the first step is to have a hearing, if all other neighbours have no objection, he can go ahead of his plan.
However, some of the neighbours didn't like his idea and rejected him during the hearing. The neighbours not only don't like a bigger than standard house, but also the modern style looking design.
After the hearing, the new owner willing to build a smaller one which match the city's standard, however, the neighbours still not accept the modern design. Their point is the new design doesn't match with the style of other houses. Afterward, from the letter of City to all neighbours clearly stated that the new owner has the rights to build a house with any style.
The neighbours understand they cannot stop the new design so the only way to stop it is making the issue big enough. So, they plan to form a resident association, by using massive power to affect the politicians and the City. Yes, it is true that one or two neighbours may not have to power to affect the City, but a group of people or the whole district (the new association suppose to be the representative of the district) may have the power to affect something even is by-laws.
From Thomas Hobbes, it mentions the birth of leviathan (society), and how it affect the life of citizen.
But, the key point here is, who is controlling the Leviathan, a small group of people or even just one people, and he/they using Leviathan to control the majority others in order to get what he/they want. Other than that, he/they can use Leviathan to attack those he/they don't like.
小時侯,老豆叫我努力讀書。佢話,佢個年代(廿多年前),中學畢業就已經可以做銀行經理,所以讀書係好重要既。簡單D講,讀書等如有錢。
到我讀中學時,從其他人身上我知道,一定要做專業人士,不單只有收入,專業人士就等如高收入。所以呢,我就走去做專業人士。
踏足工作,社會上就大吹MBA風,無論乜鬼行業,D人都話要去讀返個MBA,讀完MBA就好似一定識管理(又唔見當年一街都係努資問題,咪一鬼樣),有MBA就好似有收入保證。
再過幾年,李超人就話,我讀到小學,但幫我打工既個個都係大學碩士博士。社會上,人人開始發現,學歷同搵錢或者你富身家係無直接關係,都唔知讀咁多為乜。
現在,所謂專業就更加提心吊膽,因為隨時比人告,專業人士個個都要買保險。
近來,新世代,買了幾個 bitcoins,炒幾炒,唔使一年,搵到既錢多個佢老豆退休時既資產總數。咁,咁努力做足幾十年儲足幾十年都唔夠新世代炒幾炒。
世界變,連搵錢既方法都不斷變,我呢類老鬼又憑什麼來教新一代搵錢呢?
理論上/事實上,人類是沒法了解到 真。
我們了解事物都是需要通過感觀 (五觀),然後再由我們的認知去分析確認事物。
我們的眼有很多光譜是看不到,耳有很多音頻是聽不到,嗅覺,味覺亦是如是。
我們的認知受我們的腦功能影響,記憶力,過往記憶,經驗,態度等等。
所以,要真正認知,或找出事情事物之真 (真相,真理),是不可能的。很多哲學家都有論述。
我們頂多是接近 真相,真理。但當然我不同意,因為不知真又如何知近呢?
不知真,不等於不能活,只是要小心那些所謂知道真的人。