Recently I heard a saying
When a person is without a goal (life goal), he will look for happiness.
It seems that happiness is the lowest form of life goal. It is the lowest one to maintain you wake up in the morning and live as a living thing.
Think about a child who keeps playing video games every day. You know that if he has a life goal, he can give up his cell phone.
曾幾何時香港電影業都呼籲香港市民支持本土電影，最簡單方法就係課金入戲院睇香港戲。
呢一種想法係香港電影行業工作人員嘅想法。對於一般普羅大眾市民而言他們的想法又會係如何呢？就我自己而言只要係好嘅電影我就會睇，不會理會產地來源。
所以簡單地講，香港電影業想市民撐香港電影最簡單方法就係拍好電影。有好電影香港市民自然會課金。對於香港爛片你又叫市民如何撐你呢？
有時唔係只係一個國家會帶講民族主義蠱惑人心，其實唔同行業例如電影業都會上用民族主義古惑人心，而家真係要小心啲。
很多民主國家都會出現政黨輸替的現象，亦是一個很自然的現象。但是政黨輪換的一個首要條件：所有政黨都必須是以國家的利益為首。例如，美國，加拿大政黨輪替是常見的。但像台灣，國民黨多年上不到台與他們偏向中共的立場是有莫大的關係，台灣人民如果放心交給一個可能賣國的政黨呢？
If you believe in God, why can't you believe in magic, flying fire dragon, elf, Santa .... etc etc.
If you haven't argued with people believing in God, please don't laughing at people believe in magic, dragon ..... etc etc
If you respect people believing in God, please also respect people believe in magic .... etc etc
If you haven't proved God doesn't exist, please don't proved magic .... etc etc don't exist.
P.S. do you believe in God?
There is no such thing as Truth but Perspective (personal or communal). without truth, there will be no right or wrong.
Using "perspective" in your daily life makes your life much easier, get along with others much easier
P.S.
strictly speaking, everything that comes from your brain is the product of perspective
it is rather difficult to prove someone's perspective is wrong even if you find them have internal conflict
there are two people in front of you who are going to be trained
one of them is with heart but no skill and knowledge
one of them is having skill and knowledge but without heart
if you are going to train only 1 of them, who are you going to pick for training?
P.S. I will pick the one with heart because I am not confident enough to train somebody to become full of heart.
MAJORITY
mainstream
integration
majority
adjust
adopt
MINORITY
fairness
respect
discrimination
culture
understand
之前講過後真相。今日再講另一個角度。
當面對面對住一個人，你是否就是看到了那個人真相？
當然不是
一。你只見到那個人在特定時空的的特定部份，這顯然不是那個人的真相。今天的我與昨日的我絕對不會一樣。
二。你看到的只是你想看的那部份而並不是全部。舉例而言，當你看戲，你看到奸角，你自然覺得他／她不順眼，任何事都是錯的，就算是做好事都是別有用心的。但當你看到好心地的角色，就算是做了錯事都是無心之失，環境所迫等等。
人，是否真的可以看到真相？
縱使你對著鏡子，你是否可以看到真正的你自己？主線都不是你如何面對你自己而是了解你自己。
要維繫一段關係，無論是夫妻，朋友，有來有往是一個非常重要的原素。單方面的輸出或是接收是不能長久。
舉一個例子，朋友之間互相幫助是很自然的，朋友A"每次"見朋友B只會要求朋友B幫助，很快，朋友B便會疏遠A了，單向搵着數，係人都怕左你。但反之，若朋友A有時見面不是要求幫助而是帶給B快樂，那麼關係就可維持較長。
有一個重點要記：維繫，沒有關係不需要維繫，要維繫是要花點功夫的。
you know your real response only when you stay in the specific situation but not in your own thought.
yes, you can think over and over again, but it would never be your real response.
if you want to know who you are, walk into it but not think about it.
do u believe santa exist?
if you believe god exist, why i can't believe santa exist?
if you believe jesus can perform miracle, why i can't believe santa has magic?
ho ho ho
以前讀歷史，常常聽到士農工商，一個國家把人分了4級，開議士大夫為首是農民其次工人最後是商人。
近來英女皇駕崩，所有皇室成員出席喪禮時都是著軍服。其中帶出了一個明確的信息。一個國家將人民分類的等級不是士農工商，而是軍士農工商，軍人永遠排第一位。歷史書沒有寫但事實卻正正擺在眼前。只是做君王的奸狡。
農工商如何排法沒關，排序可以因應當其時的情況而調動，而最重要是軍第一。
Ask "how the decision was made" instead of how to make the decision
More informative is collected in order to know how one really think but not how oneself think how he think.
1. 25 21係一齣令人好傷感嘅愛情劇集。當然除了愛情線還有其他發展嘅線路，例如個人奮鬥成長路線。
2. 25 21其中一個成功嘅原因係，導演或者編劇喺第一集嘅時候就已經清楚話畀你知，呢一對戀人最後係唔會喺埋一齊。所以大家嘅集中力就係去了解點解最後佢哋唔能夠係咪一齊。同一般愛情片集唔同，一般愛情片集通常就係觀眾睇下呢對戀人最後是否可以喺埋一齊還是唔會係咪一齊，大家追劇無非就係睇最後嘅結局。
25 21嘅拍攝手法，到最後會令到所有觀眾有好大嘅壓力同埋傷感，原因係觀眾同主角一齊成長經歷咗無數嘅時間，衝破種種難關種種障礙，但最後故事主角都唔能夠係咪一齊，所以帶出嚟嘅壓力係非常之大，非常傷感，觀眾唔係好能夠接受故事嘅結局。所以導演同編劇嘅功力係非同小可。
3. 另外25 21令到我開始想寫日記。我有寫日誌嘅習慣但唔係日記。我嘅日誌主要係寫一啲我對近來發生事情嘅睇法，所以唔係日日寫，因為唔係日日都有特別事發生，而發生嘅事未必有令我想思考嘅地方。
但日記係只係記錄每天發生嘅平常事，當然裏面包括反省同檢討。日記除了紀錄每天發生嘅鎖碎事之外，最重要係記錄自己嘅反省同檢討。呢一個過程就係記錄咗我個人嘅成長。對檢討我個人成長發揮莫大功能。
