用AI將相片改成宮崎駿嘅風格大行其道,使我突然想起當年數碼相機嘅推出。
當年數碼相機推出之後,好似變成人人都識得影相,人人都是攝影大師。尤其是當手機都可以影相再加上有facebook呢啲social media可以post相。呢個風氣就更甚。
對於真係識得影相嘅人,一幅好嘅相片係有佢特定嘅定義。但問題係,現今嘅人仲會唔會用心去追求所為美呢?定係打下咭,擦下存在感就已經心滿意足。
生命就像編織一樣,用自己的手,一針一針的編織出自己的歷史。 Life is like knitting, we knit our history pin by pin.
用AI將相片改成宮崎駿嘅風格大行其道,使我突然想起當年數碼相機嘅推出。
當年數碼相機推出之後,好似變成人人都識得影相,人人都是攝影大師。尤其是當手機都可以影相再加上有facebook呢啲social media可以post相。呢個風氣就更甚。
對於真係識得影相嘅人,一幅好嘅相片係有佢特定嘅定義。但問題係,現今嘅人仲會唔會用心去追求所為美呢?定係打下咭,擦下存在感就已經心滿意足。
From the other perspective to learn about Buddhism. You have to ask two main questions.
Q1. Are you preparing to die?
Q2. Are you ready to die?
Based on these two questions, you can have other perspective to interpret the Buddhism or to teachings of Buddha.
When you're planning your retirement, to a certain extent, I think you don't like your job.
Don't be scared to speak a foreign language. Remember this
"You speak English because it is your mother language.
I speak English because you can only speak English."
I sit in my old car and talk to it
You are growing old and same as me
You are having minor problem and same as me
But you can skill keep moving and same as me
One day, you will break down same as me
Let's enjoy our life before we both break down
我終於知道我唔可能成為一個學者。
學者者,以理性科學了解人和事。很利害啊,可惜的是,缺了人性。
學者經深入研究後宣佈人性是不完美的,但因為就係客觀科學分析,向著美好的價值觀就沒有了。因為有一定的價值觀就不科學客觀。
做決定係要用未來作為考慮點。好多人係做決定嘅時候都會衡量現時嘅狀況而作出一個決定。例如佢現在擁有嘅一切佢覺得都ok,因此佢就維持原狀。
但事實上世界係不停轉,人係不停向前,所以理性地做決定應該係以未來嘅狀況而作出決定。用inflation為例,你嘅錢今日夠洗唔等於喺未來夠洗因為係有inflation。
生命的軌跡。
後生時當我講生命的軌跡的時候我會聯想自己隨著一個軌跡係太空漫遊。突然間會有同另一個人嘅軌跡相遇相交,相遇一段時間之后亦會分開,我就用嚟解釋人嘅原來完去。
今時今日我講生命嘅軌跡用的方法譬如係唔同。我會議大海唯一個比喻,一班人都留咗喺一個水流入邊,隨著水流去漂浮,當然水流亦亦都有佢自己一定嘅軌跡同目的地。當有一個人有佢自己特別嘅需要嘅時候或者有佢自己想法嘅時候,佢就會離開呢個水流,又或者進入咗另一個水流。快如果冇乜特別想法嘅人,就繼續隨波逐流跟住個水流而去。當然其中亦都有啲人會加入反呢個水流,有人有出有入有出有入。
我地做人處事其實都差不多。一般都係跟著這個社會, 跟住個時代走。但突然間有自己嘅想法嘅時候可能我哋就會離開呢個社會同埋時代。舉一個例子我哋都係日出而作日入而息個個都係打工仔,但係弟子突然之間有1日我覺得想嗰一個綠色嘅環保日子,可能我就放棄哂一切我擁有嘅一切,而行入一個鄉下去開始耕田做一個農夫。
when we use AI, it implies that the answer is not 100% true and being proved. But we still using AI everyday to make decision because we accept the decision in our life no need to be 100% correct even we can by spending more time and effort in it. We are giving up accuracy by convenience.
what will our life be if most of our decision is by guess.
human is short-sighted. We do a lot of short-term plans/measures which will bring permanent suffering in long-term.
1. personality
1.1 personality = 先天
1.2 personality = 後天
1.3 personality = 先天+ 後天
1.4 personality decides your life
1.5 personality test
1.1.1 what is my personality
1.1.2 what is my parent personalities
1.1.3 what will i be
1.1.4 what is the best match my personality
1.1.5 living inside the frame
1.1.6 will feel helpless in one's life
1.2.1 what make my personality (incidents)
1.2.2 what personality i want to be
1.2.3 what i want to be
1.2.4 what to change in order to match what i want
1.2.5 frame can be built and re-built
1.2.6 will create internal conflict with 1.3
1.2.7 facing time and resource restriction
1.3.1 what is my limitation to be what i want to be
1.3.2 what is my life floor and ceiling
1.3.3 practical in time-space limited environment
1.5.1 personality test tells you what you told it
呢個係一個有趣嘅故事
有一個農莊主人佢想請臨時工
係朝頭早有一個工人嚟應徵農莊主人叫佢即時開工
去到食中午飯之前又有一個工人嚟應徵農莊主人又叫佢即時開工
午飯過後又有一個工人離認證農莊主人又叫佢即時開工
去到黃昏嘅時候,收工喇,農莊主人向各人派咗一個銀幣作為當日嘅工資
最早開工嘅工人大叫唔公平,佢一早開工做足全日都係得一個銀幣而其他人只係做咗半天又有一個銀幣所以非常之唔公平
農莊主人答,你開工係基於一個契約,而我亦完成契約裏面嘅條款。係呢件事上面同公平有咩關係?
I am not smarter than you, I just older than you. I went through something that you do not. I know my mistake and how to improve it. I don't have the 2nd chance to face it again but I have a younger you.
If the world has not gone through a huge change, you will face the problem of mine when you reach my age.
今日坐在淺草寺,腦內就想到
1. 佛學講因果,佛都不能被免。
2. 要不跌入因果,最簡單就是不動,不動就是不生因,果報完就無因無果。
3. 所以就算被打被殺也不可還手,因為是在了因。
4. 但了因並不是只是一世。因地果還生,可能要很多世。
5. 但要保持多世不動,很不可能。
6. 心經講色即是空,空即是色。就是一層突破。因果是被不了,但自性如如,在因果中而不受因果所牽絆,什至善用因果。
you don't give a reason when you say Yes to a request. Then, why do you have to provide a reason when you say No?
To be fair, if somebody asks for a reason for a No, they have to give a reason for the Yes.
our beliefs become our thoughts
our thoughts become our words
our words become our actions
our actions become our habits
what is an immigrant?
An immigrant is a person who contributes to the national revenue without spending it.
Normal citizens spend national revenue when they are small such as on education, and they contribute national revenue when they start to work after school. But an immigrant is not.
From the perspective of a nation, a local newborn is an investment. The nation invests in them and expects in return when they join the labour force. However, the nation loses if the newborn leaves the country.
However, for an immigrant, the story is totally via verse.
There is no use to counsel a person who is sleeping and dreaming sweetly. Maybe you need to slap them awake first.
we don't know how we retrieve our memory, but when someone talks about a past event, we can recall it, the sound the picture, and the feeling as well. This is the use of the heart (心之用).
From the use of the heart, we know the essence of the heart (心之本). However, we never know how the essence of the heart looks like.
Remember, in ancient times, people don't know anything about the biology of the brain. They know there is a brain but how it works, and the function of different parts of the brain, they never know. The brain is like a black box, it cannot be described.
in Taoism, it mentions that the essence of Tao cannot be seen and heard, but we are so sure its present because we can see, and hear its use.
I feel that is why Japanese is so special.
Japanese do as they are without caring about how others think, or how the world change.
they keep their customs as it is, they celebrate the ways they are. At the same time, outsiders really like what they insist on their own ways of life.
- we need social to cure loneliness, when too much social we need solitude.
- what if, we are brought up by AI.
- we don't need human social interaction anymore
- we have tailor-made interaction
- then, we don't know how to interact with other people
- we don't know how to handle other people's emotions, perspectives, thinking, etc.
- we don't need EQ anymore
- we are self-centered
- I think maybe we interact with other people through AI, AI will become a bridge between humans.
- I once heard that we work not for money/salary
- we work to accumulate our experience or sharpen our skills in one career/field
- once we become experts in the field, it is time to pick a company and job and salary
- So, we don't mind overtime and you don't mind salary, you don't mind working hard because these things are sharpening you to be a successful person in the future
- most people work for money/salary, and what about you?
- this perspective leads to another thing that most company/boss don't like
- where is the loyalty?
- btw, don't kidding. will the company be loyal to its hard-working staff?
tax
税高税低?
- 一個國家的運作要錢,錢主要從税收而來。當然有些國家會炒股票,收罰款(無論合理與否),做生意等等增加收入
- 稅收基本上是由 1. 個人税收 & 2. 公司税收
- 個人的稅收可以是薪俸稅, 銷售稅等
- 公司的稅收可以是利得稅, 關稅等
- 公司的税收是有趣的事情,公司會負責税務嗎?
- 公司會交税但負責的卻不是公司而是客戶個人,因為所有要交的稅都會計算在物價內。
- 所以, 可以說交稅的從來都是個人
- 當一個國家的個人入息税(直接稅)率低是可能嗎?
- 根據以上的理解, 除非國家很懂得搵錢, 否則, 個人直接稅低就表個人間接稅會很高
money.
in the old days, money could be exchanged for gold. People trust gold so they trust money as well, and gold is the basic unit of money.
Nowadays, money no longer be exchanged for gold. We still use money because we trust in the nations that issue money, e.g. the USA, and Japan. So, the basic unit of money is TRUST nowadays.
But, what about if we don't trust the nations any more?
looking at the sky.
someone know that they can't find out the beginning of the universe so they give up and only focus on present things.
someone know they never find out the beginning of the universe but they still insist looking into it.
2024 Olympics, it gives me an impression that those become popular is not the gold medals winner but the cool guys.
We know that more people like to chase the cool guys in FB instead of the most successful one nowadays.
接
朋友之間貴呼真誠.
自己贊自己, 朋友會戥你高興.
你呻苦時, 朋友會安慰你.
都是出自真心.
若果你聽到朋友說話時你有#13的反應, 或者你說話時你朋友有#13反應, 相信, 你們不是真心朋友.
人大了, 話越少. 因為大了懂得說話要顧及別人感受.
你贊一下自己又怕傷害到別人弱小心靈. 你嘲笑一下自己又怕別人話你扮晒嘢.
所以, 最後都是不說話, 但別人多說, 你又話佢 show quali, 廢 up.
self 自我
- a baby doesn't have self and building it day by day.
- some people say the self is the culminating of our memory and experience
- when we have enough memory and experience we know who we are.
- on the other hand, we are the product of what we experienced
during our childhood
- and also we may create our future self by what we do in the present
- In conclusion, the self is changing.
- the last question is who are we before the appearance of the self?
- on the other hand, 無我 equal to think and act like a baby?
- 無我 is the one that hasn't been corrupted by the 後天 environment.
- 無我, is it a basic animal form?
there is no stupid people. you think they are stupid because you don't know their situations and what they treasure.
- 今日見到掃地姐姐, 佢望住部手機, 我問佢睇緊乜? 佢話開屋企部自動掃地機掃地. 我同佢講, 唔好同佢老世講, 唔知佢明唔明.
- yes, automation is all over the city. and I see many frontline staff promoting automation to their customers. But one thing I am not sure is whether they know that when automation is fully executed, they will lose their jobs.
- this is a story of mine. one day when I went to the City to pay land tax, the cashier told me why I could pay it through a computer myself. And then I told her, I knew it, but if I paid it through a computer she would lose her job, I just don't know why she recommended it to me.
- human need a goal to work together even just for a reward
- most big corporations have a mission, vision, value, etc. If they don't have one, just yell "You got paid if you work hard" 😄
- for a place, if the common goal (X) disappears, the people will move away to another place holding (X).
- or, if goal (X) is replaced by (Y), then people believe in (Y) will come
- free will. i think it has certain levels.
- in the most strict sense, there is no free will
- for a slave, there is no free will and they cannot make their own decisions. all decisions are made by their owners.
- for a ordinary people like me, i can make my own decision even it is affected by some factors. but it still my decision that suit me the best.
- for daily living, we don't need the strict sense of free will.
- making a choice yourself doesn't mean that you have free will.
- somebody says I do this but not that, so I have free will.
- do you know what made you make that decision? If you know you are influenced by something in making the decision even if it is your internal factors, you don't have free will (absolute).
- today I am not happy so I bought myself ice cream to smooth myself, do you think you have free will? so your action is influenced by something?
- and, btw, without free will is a matter in our daily life?
- in most cases, I can make a decision freely is far more important than having free will.
😃
thing-in-itself, 物自身
if we know things through our sensory systems and interpret the signal by our brain, then we cannot know the thing-in-itself, because the thing has been interpreted by another system.
some physicists say that we cannot understand a thing, once we measure it, it is not itself.
Plato has a similar proposition that we cannot only see the shadow of things but not the thing itself.
- the world I see is not the same as the world you see.
- we see the same physical world but the perception, emotion, feeling, interpretation, etc are not the same.
- no one is in the same world.
- we can confine the world as the physical world only, but it limits "me" as a whole body,
- as a result, you don't know "me". huh? we've heard of it in many movies, haven't we?
- even if we do, the sensory is not the same for everyone. what is red? how red? it is totally different with everyone. no one sees the same red.
- think about a movie. if it is a 60 mins movie.
- when we are watching the 30th min, we are in the middle of the movie
- before the 30th min, it is the past, after it is the future.
- but
- a 60 mins movie is filmed and all the content is already in the film.
- the beginning and the end of the movie already filmed
- when we watching the 30th min, the end also been filmed which mean that we already know the ending
- if some people watching the ending at the same time we are watching the middle. so, he knows the ending ahead
what is time?
地球自轉一次叫一日?
地球圍繞太陽一圈叫一年?
後來,好似用石英Quartz 來計算時間。
But, all of them are the unit of time or the measure of time, but they are not time itself. so, what is time?
before now is past?
after now is future?
then, what is now?
now is not a static point, it moves.
when you look at (1), this now, but when you look at (2), this is also now and (1) becomes past. so, what is now? (1) or (2)?
The reason why i use AI such as copolit or chatgpt instead of Google search to search for information in the internet is: AI contains no ads.
每一個人生存都有"基本生存消費", 這個消費亦是對環保做成的傷害程度.
就如原始人, 他們的"基本生存消費"很低但不等如零, 起碼, 他們會生火煮食 (產生CO2), 又會放屁 (產生溫室氣體) 等等.
以現代人而言, 這個"基本生存消費"已經不再基本了. 現代人所用的一切, 所做的一切都大大增加了這個"生存消費", 變相是增加了環保傷害指數.
要 offset 這個"生存消費"
在講 offset 之前, 首先先講'環境保護'並不是真的保護環境. 這是一個人類自欺而產生的詞語. Mother Nature 要你保護嗎? Mother Nature 喜歡 O2 而不喜歡 CO2 嗎? Mother Nature 喜歡風和日麗而不喜歡狂風暴雨嗎? Mother Nature 不喜歡冰河時期? Mother Nature 喜歡有人類或生物存在嗎?
無論地球變成怎樣, 都是 Mother Nature 的一部分. 所以'環境保護'所保護的是'人類' only, 連其他生物都不在保護之列. 當然有部分環保份子說保護其他生物, 但可惜他們不是全保. 對人類致命的病毒, 細菌, 植物, 動物, 人類會保護他們嗎?
先講"基本生存消費". 人類生產出來的'環保傷害物質', 大部分是大自然是有本事自行處理掉的. 例如 CO2, 樹木會吸收 CO2轉化成對樹木有用能量, 而排出 O2. 基本上是 offset 了人類的'環保傷害物質'.
但如果'生存消費'大高, '環保傷害物質'太多, 那麼大自然是沒法 offset 了這些'環保傷害物質'. 但背後隱藏了一個事實, 就是 balance point, 即大自然能完全處理人類生產的'環保傷害物質'.
關於 jetlag 問題,我的感覺
Everyone has a 生理時鐘. When to wake, when to sleep, when to eat. It can be changed.
When you visit another country, lets say 12 hours behind or ahead. Owing to the new time, you have a new "clock" for daily living.
So, in this situation, you have 2 生理時鐘, an old one and a new one.
You need to shifting from the old one to the new one. Both click in but the old is fading out. And what you need to do is helping ourselves to fade out the old one and adopt the new one.
人類在好多年前已經向外太空發射通訊電波希望尋找外太空生物(高智慧)及接觸. 對於這個做法有兩派不同立場.
一. 應該
二. 不應該
我只是想說, 每一個星球都是一個有限的資料. 高智慧生物都必須打破這一個限制去發展, 如人類, 幾千年來都是為了資源而打個你死我活. 可以係人類之間, 亦可以是人與其他動物, 甚至乎人與大自然. 近來是甚麼? 就是移民火星, 收集外太空資源, 甚至乎尋找可以讓人類居住的其他星體.
這是一個自然的演變, 因為地球是一個有限體, 擴張是無可被免的, 在擴張的同時對其他生命的傷害亦是結果的一部分.
在這個前題底下, 人類是否應該讓其他太空中的高智慧生物知道我們的存在? 更甚是主動地?
Everyone, every organization, every country need a story for its continuency.
Some people are story makers, some are story tellers but most of them are audience.
Some people revise the story, some people create another one, some people attack the story, some people question the story.
The reason why we use "story" for our continuency because we never know what will happen in our future.
We are not using "prediction" because we want to make some meaning on what we do today, and all stories are our future dream.
Today I learned that the meaning of investing in house.
Investing in house is equal to investing in supply and demand or "the market"
The reason is: the price of a house depends on supply and demand;
demand > supply, house price rise;
supply > demand, house price fall
Once the equilibrium reached, the house price will be in stable.
So, when we are talked about using house as investment, it means that we are expecting a higher demand than supply in the near future. If we expected a supply is higher than demand in the future, nobody is willing to invest in house, as we know that the price will drop, and you will earn nothing from a house.
So, what makes the demand increase? it depends on a lot of factors.
But no matter what, you still see the house price increase year by year even the price reach equilibrium, why? Because it is the inflation. The price of the house rises owing to inflation but the value of the house has no changed.
以前,用皮鞭把人變成奴隸,之後就算不再打都乖乖成為奴隸。
現在,用金錢把人變成奴隸,之後就算沒有金錢輸送都會乖乖成為奴隸。
一旦成為奴隸,奴性便會形成。一旦形成奴性,就會成為自自然然的奴隸。
共產主義是adopt二元論,所以會出現“敵我”,“正反”,“對立”的說法。但事實上,世界的運作並不是二元的。這點就是共產主義的先天問題。以一個二元論的理論去了解多元世界,就好像用二維空間去看三維世界,一切都是平平的。活在二維空間的人永遠無法理解三維空間一樣。硬張三維空間壓到二維空間方便管理,當然最後一定失敗,反智反物性。
可惜的是,有人是痛苦地活在這種狀態中。
近來喜歡扮糊塗。
無他,別人以為你無知會多講幾句,從中可能聽到一些自己未聽過的智識,事情。
當別人“發表”才華時,你可對他有更深入的了解。事實上,人在表現自己時最難掩飾自我。
最後,有時做一回觀眾聽眾,可在煩擾的人生中享受一下第三者的寧靜。
eye is to use see/light.
before the body evolute eye, the body should know there is light outside, so that we evolute eye to see light.
but without eye how do the body know there is light?
it is the same as ear.
ear is use to hear.
without ear we cannot hear. if we cannot hear, how do we know there is sound,
without knowing there is sound, how do the body evolute ear.
Recently I heard a saying
When a person is without a goal (life goal), he will look for happiness.
It seems that happiness is the lowest form of life goal. It is the lowest one to maintain you wake up in the morning and live as a living thing.
Think about a child who keeps playing video games every day. You know that if he has a life goal, he can give up his cell phone.
曾幾何時香港電影業都呼籲香港市民支持本土電影,最簡單方法就係課金入戲院睇香港戲。
呢一種想法係香港電影行業工作人員嘅想法。對於一般普羅大眾市民而言他們的想法又會係如何呢?就我自己而言只要係好嘅電影我就會睇,不會理會產地來源。
所以簡單地講,香港電影業想市民撐香港電影最簡單方法就係拍好電影。有好電影香港市民自然會課金。對於香港爛片你又叫市民如何撐你呢?
有時唔係只係一個國家會帶講民族主義蠱惑人心,其實唔同行業例如電影業都會上用民族主義古惑人心,而家真係要小心啲。
很多民主國家都會出現政黨輸替的現象,亦是一個很自然的現象。但是政黨輪換的一個首要條件:所有政黨都必須是以國家的利益為首。例如,美國,加拿大政黨輪替是常見的。但像台灣,國民黨多年上不到台與他們偏向中共的立場是有莫大的關係,台灣人民如果放心交給一個可能賣國的政黨呢?
If you believe in God, why can't you believe in magic, flying fire dragon, elf, Santa .... etc etc.
If you haven't argued with people believing in God, please don't laughing at people believe in magic, dragon ..... etc etc
If you respect people believing in God, please also respect people believe in magic .... etc etc
If you haven't proved God doesn't exist, please don't proved magic .... etc etc don't exist.
P.S. do you believe in God?
There is no such thing as Truth but Perspective (personal or communal). without truth, there will be no right or wrong.
Using "perspective" in your daily life makes your life much easier, get along with others much easier
P.S.
strictly speaking, everything that comes from your brain is the product of perspective
it is rather difficult to prove someone's perspective is wrong even if you find them have internal conflict
there are two people in front of you who are going to be trained
one of them is with heart but no skill and knowledge
one of them is having skill and knowledge but without heart
if you are going to train only 1 of them, who are you going to pick for training?
P.S. I will pick the one with heart because I am not confident enough to train somebody to become full of heart.
MAJORITY
mainstream
integration
majority
adjust
adopt
MINORITY
fairness
respect
discrimination
culture
understand
之前講過後真相。今日再講另一個角度。
當面對面對住一個人,你是否就是看到了那個人真相?
當然不是
一。你只見到那個人在特定時空的的特定部份,這顯然不是那個人的真相。今天的我與昨日的我絕對不會一樣。
二。你看到的只是你想看的那部份而並不是全部。舉例而言,當你看戲,你看到奸角,你自然覺得他/她不順眼,任何事都是錯的,就算是做好事都是別有用心的。但當你看到好心地的角色,就算是做了錯事都是無心之失,環境所迫等等。
人,是否真的可以看到真相?
縱使你對著鏡子,你是否可以看到真正的你自己?主線都不是你如何面對你自己而是了解你自己。
要維繫一段關係,無論是夫妻,朋友,有來有往是一個非常重要的原素。單方面的輸出或是接收是不能長久。
舉一個例子,朋友之間互相幫助是很自然的,朋友A"每次"見朋友B只會要求朋友B幫助,很快,朋友B便會疏遠A了,單向搵着數,係人都怕左你。但反之,若朋友A有時見面不是要求幫助而是帶給B快樂,那麼關係就可維持較長。
有一個重點要記:維繫,沒有關係不需要維繫,要維繫是要花點功夫的。
you know your real response only when you stay in the specific situation but not in your own thought.
yes, you can think over and over again, but it would never be your real response.
if you want to know who you are, walk into it but not think about it.
do u believe santa exist?
if you believe god exist, why i can't believe santa exist?
if you believe jesus can perform miracle, why i can't believe santa has magic?
ho ho ho
以前讀歷史,常常聽到士農工商,一個國家把人分了4級,開議士大夫為首是農民其次工人最後是商人。
近來英女皇駕崩,所有皇室成員出席喪禮時都是著軍服。其中帶出了一個明確的信息。一個國家將人民分類的等級不是士農工商,而是軍士農工商,軍人永遠排第一位。歷史書沒有寫但事實卻正正擺在眼前。只是做君王的奸狡。
農工商如何排法沒關,排序可以因應當其時的情況而調動,而最重要是軍第一。
Ask "how the decision was made" instead of how to make the decision
More informative is collected in order to know how one really think but not how oneself think how he think.